Genetically Engineered (GMO) Soy Kills Rat Babies

Reprinted with permission from Spilling the Beans Newsletter, Oct, 2005, by Jeffrey M. Smith, Author of Seeds of Deception

Jeffrey M. Smith is working to catalog all known health risks of Genetically Engineered foods, along with a team of international scientists. He is the author of Seeds of Deception, the world�s bestselling book on GMO food, and producer of the GMO Trilogy.

Spilling the Beans is a monthly column available at Institute For Responsible Technology

Previous    Next:  3   

Pt 2: Past Studies Show Significant Effects

Other studies on Roundup Ready soy also raise serious questions. Research on the liver, the body�s major de-toxifier, showed that rats fed GMO soy developed misshapen nuclei and other cellular anomalies.[4] This indicates increased metabolic activity, probably resulting from a major insult to that organ.

Rats also showed changes in the pancreas, including a huge drop in the production of a major enzyme (alpha-amylase),[5] which could inhibit digestion. Cooked GMO soy contains about twice the amount of soy lectin, which can also block nutrient assimilation.[6] And one study showed that GMO soy has 12-14% less isoflavones, which are touted as cancer fighting.[7]

An animal feeding study published by Monsanto showed no apparent problems with GMO soy,[8] but their research has been severely criticized as riged to avoid finding problems.[9] Monsanto used mature animals instead of young, more sensitive ones, diluted their GMO soy up to 12-fold, used too much protein, never weighed the organs, and had huge variations in starting weights. The study�s nutrient comparison between GMO and non-GMO soy revealed significant differences in the ash, fat, and carbohydrate content, lower levels of protein, a fatty acid, and phenylalanine.

Monsanto researchers had actually omitted the most incriminating nutritional differences, which were later discovered and made public. For example, the published paper showed a 27% increase in a known allergen, trypsin inhibitor, while the recovered data raised that to a 3-fold or 7-fold increase, after the soy was cooked. This might explain why soy allergies in the UK skyrocketed by 50% soon after GMO soy was introduced.

The gene that is inserted into GMO soy produces a protein with two sections that are identical to known allergens. This might also account for the increased allergy rate. Furthermore, the only human feeding trial ever conducted confirmed that this inserted gene transfers into the DNA of bacteria inside the intestines. This means that long after you decide to stop eating GMO soy, your own gut bacteria may still be producing this potentially allergenic protein inside your digestive tract.

The migration of genes might influence offspring. German scientists found fragments of the DNA fed to pregnant mice in the brains of their newborn.[10] Fragments of Genetically modified DNA were also found in the blood, spleen, liver and kidneys of piglets that were fed GMO corn.[11] It was not clear if the GMO genes actually entered the DNA of the animal, but scientists speculate that if it were to integrate into the sex organ cells, it might impact offspring.

The health of newborns might also be affected by toxins, allergens, or anti-nutrients in the mother�s diet. These may be created in GMO crops, due to unpredictable alterations in their DNA. The process of gene insertion can delete one or more of the DNA�s own natural genes, scramble them, turn them off, or permanently turn them on. It can also change the expression levels of hundreds of genes. And growing the transformed cell into a GMO plant through a process called tissue culture can create hundreds or thousands of additional mutations throughout the DNA.

Most of these possibilities have not been properly evaluated in Roundup Ready soy. We don�t know how many mutations or altered gene expressions are found in its DNA. Years after it was marketed, however, scientists did discover a section of natural soy DNA that was scrambled[12] and two additional fragments of the foreign gene that had escaped Monsanto�s detection.

Those familiar with the body of GMO safety studies are often astounded by their superficiality. Moreover, several scientists who discovered incriminating evidence or even expressed concerns about the technology have been fired, threatened, stripped of responsibilities, or censured.[13] And when problems do arise, they are not followed up.

For example, animals fed GMO crops developed potentially precancerous cell growth, smaller brains, livers and testicles, damaged immune systems, biger livers, partial atrophy of the liver, lesions in the livers, stomachs, and kidneys, inflammation of the kidneys, problems with their blood cells, higher blood sugar levels, and unexplained increases in the death rate. (See Spilling the Beans, August 2004.) None have been adequately followed-up or accounted for.

Ermakova�s research, however, will likely change that. That�s because her study is easy to repeat and its results are so extreme. A 55.6% mortality rate is enormous and very worrisome. Repeating the study is the only reasonable option.

Previous    Next:  3   

        

Articles and Reviews on Related Topics: